Antiques & collectibles
Architecture
Art
Bibles
Biography & autobiography
Body, mind & spirit
Business & economics
Comics & graphic novels
Computers
Cooking
Crafts & hobbies
Drama
Education
Family & relationships
Fiction
Foreign language study
Games
Gardening
Health & fitness
History
House & home
Humor
Language arts & disciplines
Law
Literary collections
Literary criticism
Mathematics
Medical
Music
Nature
Performing arts
Pets
Philosophy
Photography
Poetry
Political science
Psychology
Reference
Religion
Science
Self-help
Social science
Sports & recreation
Study aids
Technology & engineering
Transportation
Travel
True crime
Young fiction
Young nonfiction
Architecture
Art
Bibles
Biography & autobiography
Body, mind & spirit
Business & economics
Comics & graphic novels
Computers
Cooking
Crafts & hobbies
Drama
Education
Family & relationships
Fiction
Foreign language study
Games
Gardening
Health & fitness
History
House & home
Humor
Language arts & disciplines
Law
Literary collections
Literary criticism
Mathematics
Medical
Music
Nature
Performing arts
Pets
Philosophy
Photography
Poetry
Political science
Psychology
Reference
Religion
Science
Self-help
Social science
Sports & recreation
Study aids
Technology & engineering
Transportation
Travel
True crime
Young fiction
Young nonfiction
Publisher Description:
During the 1990s, humanitarian intervention seemed to promise a world in which democracy, self-determination and human rights would be privileged over national interests or imperial ambitions. Orford provides critical readings of the narratives that accompanied such interventions and shaped legal justifications for the use of force by the international community. Through a close reading of legal texts and institutional practice, she argues that a far more circumscribed, exploitative and conservative interpretation of the ends of intervention was adopted during this period. The book draws on a wide range of sources, including critical legal theory, feminist and postcolonial theory, psychoanalytic theory and critical geography, to develop ways of reading directed at thinking through the cultural and economic effects of militarized humanitarianism. The book concludes by asking what, if anything, has been lost in the move from the era of humanitarian intervention to an international relations dominated by wars on terror.
During the 1990s, humanitarian intervention seemed to promise a world in which democracy, self-determination and human rights would be privileged over national interests or imperial ambitions. Orford provides critical readings of the narratives that accompanied such interventions and shaped legal justifications for the use of force by the international community. Through a close reading of legal texts and institutional practice, she argues that a far more circumscribed, exploitative and conservative interpretation of the ends of intervention was adopted during this period. The book draws on a wide range of sources, including critical legal theory, feminist and postcolonial theory, psychoanalytic theory and critical geography, to develop ways of reading directed at thinking through the cultural and economic effects of militarized humanitarianism. The book concludes by asking what, if anything, has been lost in the move from the era of humanitarian intervention to an international relations dominated by wars on terror.
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by category


