Antiques & collectibles
Architecture
Art
Bibles
Biography & autobiography
Body, mind & spirit
Business & economics
Comics & graphic novels
Computers
Cooking
Crafts & hobbies
Drama
Education
Family & relationships
Fiction
Foreign language study
Games
Gardening
Health & fitness
History
House & home
Humor
Language arts & disciplines
Law
Literary collections
Literary criticism
Mathematics
Medical
Music
Nature
Performing arts
Pets
Philosophy
Photography
Poetry
Political science
Psychology
Reference
Religion
Science
Self-help
Social science
Sports & recreation
Study aids
Technology & engineering
Transportation
Travel
True crime
Young fiction
Young nonfiction
Architecture
Art
Bibles
Biography & autobiography
Body, mind & spirit
Business & economics
Comics & graphic novels
Computers
Cooking
Crafts & hobbies
Drama
Education
Family & relationships
Fiction
Foreign language study
Games
Gardening
Health & fitness
History
House & home
Humor
Language arts & disciplines
Law
Literary collections
Literary criticism
Mathematics
Medical
Music
Nature
Performing arts
Pets
Philosophy
Photography
Poetry
Political science
Psychology
Reference
Religion
Science
Self-help
Social science
Sports & recreation
Study aids
Technology & engineering
Transportation
Travel
True crime
Young fiction
Young nonfiction
Dispatched from Southport
United Kingdom
Usually dispatched within 2-3 days
United Kingdom
Usually dispatched within 2-3 days
Publisher Description:
One of Japan's leading literary critics, Kojin Karatani is perhaps best known for his speculative philosophical works that, ranging from Kant to Nishida to Wittgenstein and Derida, are the generic equivalent to what in the West is called "theory". Karatani's writings are examples of a distinctly non-Western theoretical tradition. In "Architecture as Metaphor", Karatani examines the relationship between archtecture and philosophy, literature, linguistics, city planning, anthropology, political economy, psychoanalysis and mathematics. Specifically, he tackles the recurrent "will to architecture", which he argues is the foundation of all Western thinking. In the three parts of the book, he shows the necessity of construction, deconstruction and complex, secular construction/deconstruction. Because the will to architecture is practically nonexistent in Japan, Karatani must affirm the architectonic, which he does in the first section using a method based on formalist/structuralist linguistics, anthropology, and mathematics.He then explores the limits of formalism by reading the work of Jane Jacobs, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari and Gregory Bateson against city planner Christopher Alexander's model of trees and semi-lattices. Finally, Karatani pushes formalism to its limits by reexamining the deconstructive implications of Kurt Godel's incompletness theorem.
One of Japan's leading literary critics, Kojin Karatani is perhaps best known for his speculative philosophical works that, ranging from Kant to Nishida to Wittgenstein and Derida, are the generic equivalent to what in the West is called "theory". Karatani's writings are examples of a distinctly non-Western theoretical tradition. In "Architecture as Metaphor", Karatani examines the relationship between archtecture and philosophy, literature, linguistics, city planning, anthropology, political economy, psychoanalysis and mathematics. Specifically, he tackles the recurrent "will to architecture", which he argues is the foundation of all Western thinking. In the three parts of the book, he shows the necessity of construction, deconstruction and complex, secular construction/deconstruction. Because the will to architecture is practically nonexistent in Japan, Karatani must affirm the architectonic, which he does in the first section using a method based on formalist/structuralist linguistics, anthropology, and mathematics.He then explores the limits of formalism by reading the work of Jane Jacobs, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari and Gregory Bateson against city planner Christopher Alexander's model of trees and semi-lattices. Finally, Karatani pushes formalism to its limits by reexamining the deconstructive implications of Kurt Godel's incompletness theorem.
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by category


